| March 16, 2005
WRIA 56 Hangman (Latah) Creek Watershed Planning Unit Meeting Spokane County Conservation District Chair: Walt Edelen, Spokane County Conservation District (SCCD) Present: Keith Holliday, Department of Ecology Dee Bailey, Coeur d’Alene Tribe Bill Rickard, City of Spokane, Environmental Programs Shallan Dawson, Spokane County Conservation District Rob Lindsay, Spokane County Rick Noll, Spokane County Conservation District Peter Grunte, Landowner Garry Ostheller, Landowner Steve Bortfeld, Hangman Hills Water District AGENDA/Minutes The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. Two sets of minutes were discussed. The February 3rd minutes were approved with the following change. The plan approval schedule for the City of Spokane is currently unclear. The minutes should reflect the uncertainty in the timeline and not state any tentative schedule. The February 23rd minutes were approved with the following changes. Steve Bortfeld was in attendance at this meeting and should be added to the Members Present list. Lloyd Brewer was in attendance for Bill Rickard. This should be reflected in the minutes. On page one, the third paragraph under the instream flow section should be changed to state that the Skagit instream flow ruling was not approved. An amendment has been developed and is currently out for review. Water Resources Management Program Recommendation (Instream Flow Discussions) Keith Holliday explained his recent discussions with the City of Spokane staff and the potential for continuing work on an instream flow recommendation for Hangman Creek. The conclusion between Ecology and the City of Spokane was to continue working towards the management of instream flow in the basin. This recommendation may be put forward by the PU as a recommendation (yet to be worded). Plan Approval Schedule The Watershed Plan has been distributed to the City Council. A workshop will be conducted on March 31st to review the plan and answer questions. Rick, Walt, Keith, Bill, and Lloyd will be in attendance. Bill reiterated that the schedule for plan approval through the Council is unknown at this time. However, he will acknowledge progress as it occurs. The next step will be to have a Planning Unit Meeting to approve the plan. Once it is formally approved by the Planning Unit, we will pursue approval by the Spokane and Whitman County Commissioners. Walt has submitted the document to the Whitman County Commissioners for review. Reanette has submitted the document to the Spokane County Commissioners for review. Rob Lindsay stated that both the 55/57 and 56 watershed plans are moving along through the approval process together and that it may be better to run them by the commissioners separately to avoid confusion of watershed issues and recommendations. He further stated that the process would be as follows: plan is reviewed by commissioners (a joint meeting between Whitman and Spokane); a public hearing is scheduled (each county does their own). After that, it is up to the commissioners to act on it. Keith Holliday mentioned that Ecology would conduct an internal review of the plan. He anticipates a couple of weeks between the City of Spokane workshop and the PU approval process. Tekoa Golf Course Update Keith Stouffel, from Ecology, has been working with Walt and the golf course representatives to develop options for the short and long term. The Golf Course is still trying to find valid documentation of a surface water right and may have some new leads on where to find it. They need approximately 100-acre feet/per year. Otherwise, the current options are as follows: Discussion ensued regarding the Planning Unit’s role in assisting the golf course. The Planning Unit has funding available for discretionary use, but the funds are contingent on final plan approval by the County Commissioners, consensus of planning unit members, and approval by Ecology financial staff. The planning unit members did not agree on all aspects of assisting the golf course, but did agree that additional discussion and research needs to occur before final decisions could be made. In effort to facilitate assistance, the planning unit further discussed other potential “early action items” that may possibly be funded by the available funding. Early Action Items The planning unit discussed the following items for implementation. Wording may be modified at a later date. The following Early Action Items have been developed by the WRIA 56 Planning Unit. These actions are not prioritized and will be implemented as funding and opportunities provide. Next Meeting The following meeting is tentatively set for April 28th to approve the plan from 10 am to 12 noon. Confirmation will be sent at a later date. The meeting was adjourned at 11:40 a.m.
|